Difference between revisions of "ISWC2010 Evaluation"
(→Ontologies and Knowledge Bases) |
(→Statistics) |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<strong>Extraneous Percepts</strong> | <strong>Extraneous Percepts</strong> | ||
[[Image:trend_extraneous.jpg|none|thumb|600px| Figure 10. ]] | [[Image:trend_extraneous.jpg|none|thumb|600px| Figure 10. ]] | ||
+ | <strong>Theories</strong> | ||
+ | [[Image:trend_theory.jpg|none|thumb|600px| Figure 11. ]] |
Revision as of 23:36, 24 June 2010
Contents
[hide]Ontology of Perception: A Semantic Web Approach to Enhance Machine Perception
Today, many sensor networks and their applications employ a brute force approach to collecting and analyzing sensor data, and ignore the semantics inherent in the environmental data. Such an approach often wastes valuable resources – including both energy and computational resources – by unnecessarily tasking sensors and generating observations of minimal use. People, on the other hand, have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to efficiently perceive their environment. Such mechanisms include the use of background knowledge to determine what aspects of the environment to focus and a strong interdependent relationship between our ability to observe and perceive. In this paper, we develop an ontology of perception – derived from cognitive theory – that may be used to more efficiently collect and analyze sensor data. We evaluate this approach by collecting and analyzing observations of weather conditions, and show up to 50% reduction in the number of observations necessary for analysis.
System Architecture
Perception Cycle
Perception Process
Observation Process
Ontologies and Knowledge Bases
- Observation Knowledge Base
- Weather Background Knowledge
- Perception Ontology
- Perception Datasets (generated during various executions of the perception cycle):
Statistics
Percepts Generated during Evaluation: # and %
25 Miles
50 Miles
100 Miles
200 Miles
400 Miles
Percepts Generated during Evaluation: Trends
Grounded Percepts
Extraneous Percepts
Theories