Difference between revisions of "Linked Open Social Signals"

From Knoesis wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ))
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
* But are tweets interesting at all?
 
* But are tweets interesting at all?
** Every public tweet, ever, since Twitter’s inception in March 2006, will be archived digitally at the Library of Congress. That’s a LOT of tweets, by the way: Twitter processes more than 50 million tweets every day, with the total numbering in the billions. http://www.loc.gov/tweet/how-tweet-it-is.html
+
** "Every public tweet, ever, since Twitter’s inception in March 2006, will be archived digitally at the Library of Congress. That’s a LOT of tweets, by the way: Twitter processes more than 50 million tweets every day, with the total numbering in the billions." http://www.loc.gov/tweet/how-tweet-it-is.html
 +
** "We have classified the trending topics based on the active period and the tweets and show that the majority
 +
(over 85%) of topics are headline news or persistent news in nature." http://an.kaist.ac.kr/~haewoon/papers/2010-www-twitter.pdf
  
 
* But what are the use cases? Is there commercial interest?
 
* But what are the use cases? Is there commercial interest?
Line 51: Line 53:
 
** Decentralized Microblogging
 
** Decentralized Microblogging
 
*** [http://jeffsayre.com/2010/02/24/a-flock-of-twitters-decentralized-semantic-microblogging decentralized semantic microblogging].
 
*** [http://jeffsayre.com/2010/02/24/a-flock-of-twitters-decentralized-semantic-microblogging decentralized semantic microblogging].
 
 
  
 
= Related =
 
= Related =

Revision as of 18:05, 6 May 2010

At any second of the day, millions of Web users are simultaneously publishing opinions, observations and suggestions, or generally "social signals" that may represent invaluable information for businesses and researchers around the world.

In this work we investigate the representation of social signals as structured data in order to enable flexibility in handling the information overload of those interested in collectively analyzing social signals for sensemaking.

This is work in progress by Pablo N. Mendes (Kno.e.sis), Alex Passant (DERI), Pavan Kapanipathi (Kno.e.sis) and Amit P. Sheth (Kno.e.sis). This work extends ideas from Twitris and SMOB.

Demonstration

We have two demonstration videos and a live demo. The first video demonstrates the user perspective, interacting with the system to formulate a query and obtain microblog posts that match that query. The second video demonstrates the modules of our architecture at work, distributing the microposts via pubsubhubbub.


Architecture

Architecture.png

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • But are tweets interesting at all?
    • "Every public tweet, ever, since Twitter’s inception in March 2006, will be archived digitally at the Library of Congress. That’s a LOT of tweets, by the way: Twitter processes more than 50 million tweets every day, with the total numbering in the billions." http://www.loc.gov/tweet/how-tweet-it-is.html
    • "We have classified the trending topics based on the active period and the tweets and show that the majority

(over 85%) of topics are headline news or persistent news in nature." http://an.kaist.ac.kr/~haewoon/papers/2010-www-twitter.pdf

  • Information Overload: but how can you make sense of so much data?
    • As reported by ReadWriteWeb recently, during an emergency it’s practically impossible to get status updates on things like roads, hospitals, airports, and people using Twitter [1]
    • Twitter as a poor vehicle for marketing [2]. Many people make up hashtags as they tweet, exploding the semantic graph, creating more semantic dispersion. Some promising new tools that can help you quickly put a hashtag in context — or let people easily look up the meaning of the hashtags you launch or use [3]
    • Wouldn’t it be cool if Twitter had a topic backbone and you could snap your tweets to it as you write them? [4]
  • Information Delivery: Push vs Pull
    • Siegel’s rule for information life span: The half-life relevance of a piece of pushed information is about the same as the frequency of the medium. [5]
      • Twitter developed a new set of frameworks @anywhere for adding this Twitter experience anywhere on the web. Imagine being able to follow a New York Times journalist directly from her byline, tweet about a video without leaving YouTube, and discover new Twitter accounts while visiting the Yahoo! home page—and that’s just the beginning. [6]
    • Persistent Search: http://billburnham.blogs.com/burnhamsbeat/2006/04/persistent_sear.html
    • Understanding the Real-Time Web for Web Developers [7]
    • Decentralized Microblogging

Related

  • Bibliography of Research on Twitter & Microblogging [8]
  • Priamos a middleware architecture for real time semantic web [9]

At Kno.e.sis

  • Social Signals @kno.e.sis
  • A. Sheth, Semantic Integration of Citizen Sensor Data and Multilevel Sensing: A comprehensive path towards event monitoring and situational awareness, February 17, 2009.
  • A. Sheth, Citizen Sensing, Social Signals, and Enriching Human Experience- IEEE Internet Computing, July/August 2009.
  • Meenakshi Nagarajan, Karthik Gomadam, Amit P. Sheth, Ajith Ranabahu, Raghava Mutharaju, Ashutosh Jadhav: Spatio-Temporal-Thematic Analysis of Citizen Sensor Data: Challenges and Experiences. WISE 2009: 539-553 [10]

At DERI

At Twitter.com

Semantic Microblogging

  • http://semantictwitter.appspot.com/
    • HyperTwitter is semantic hashtags on Twitter. Associate hashtags together and then performer searches. Clever. Though you might want to create a special Twitter account for doing the associations rather than sending these commands through your main Twitter account.
    • Technical Report

Maybe related

  • Short and Tweet: Experiments on Recommending Content from Information Streams [11]
  • Cheng. Fall'09 class project at iSchool (Berkeley). Classifying Metatweets pdf
  • Klout on health care: [12]
  • Topsy on health care: [13]
  • Krishnamurty, Gill, Arlitt. SIGCOMM'08. A few chirps about twitter. pdf
    • classifies 100,000 users in broadcasters, acquaintances, miscreants or evangelists.

Streaming SPARQL

  • Barbieri et al. C-SPARQL: SPARQL for Continuous Querying WWW'09 poster EDBT'10
  • Barbieri and Della Valle, LDOW2010. A Proposal for Publishing Data Streams as Linked Data (A Position Paper) [14]
  • Streaming SPARQL - Extending SPARQL to Process Data Streams ESWC'08
  • A SPARQL Engine for Streaming RDF Data SITIS'07

Scalability